What Was the Non Cooperation Movement? How Gandhi's Strategy Shook the British Empire

The Non-Cooperation Movement was a significant phase of India’s freedom struggle, launched by Mahatma Gandhi in 1920. It urged Indians to boycott British institutions, titles, goods, and services to resist colonial rule through non-violence. Sparked by events like the Jallianwala Bagh massacre and the Rowlatt Act, it gained massive public support across the country. Although suspended in 1922 after the Chauri Chaura incident, it marked a turning point in uniting Indians for self-rule.

What is Non Cooperation Movement? The non-cooperation movement, initiated on August 1, 1920, by Mahatma Gandhi, aimed to urge Indians to withdraw their cooperation with the British government in hopes of achieving self-governance. Triggered by the Indian National Congress withdrawing support for British reforms post the oppressive Rowlatt Act of March 18, 1919, which curtailed political prisoners’ rights, the movement gained momentum after the Jallianwala Bagh massacre of April 13, 1919.

The Non-Cooperation Movement, initiated by Mahatma Gandhi in 1920, was a widespread protest in India focused on attaining self-governance (Swaraj) through peaceful resistance to British colonial rule. It urged Indians to stop supporting British institutions and to withhold cooperation from the colonial administration. This movement played a crucial role in India’s fight for independence, promoting national unity and representing the first significant instance of nonviolent opposition.

What is Non Cooperation Movement?

India’s struggle for independence took a new direction in 1920-21 with the rise of two key movements: the Khilafat Movement and the Non-Cooperation Movement. What is Non Cooperation Movement? It was initiated by Mahatma Gandhi in 1920 as a call for mass participation in peaceful resistance against British rule. Gandhi encouraged Indians to boycott British goods, services, and institutions as a way to challenge colonial control. What is Non Cooperation Movement’s purpose? It aimed to unite Indians and weaken the British grip on India through non-violent means. What is Non Cooperation Movement’s significance? It played a crucial role in mobilizing public opinion and advancing the fight for independence.

This movement converged with the Khilafat Movement by late summer, uniting Indians against British institutions, laws, and policies. Gandhi’s prior successes in localized movements like Champaran and Kheda had already established him as a leader, allowing him to mobilize the masses across the nation, marking a new era of nationwide struggle.

Overview table of the Non Cooperation Movement

Aspect	Details
Leader	Mahatma Gandhi
Time Period	1920-1922
Objective	Resist British rule through non-cooperation
Methods	Movement suspended after the Chauri Chaura incident
Reason	Jallianwala Bagh massacre, Rowlatt Act
Outcome	Movement suspended after Chauri Chaura incident
Legacy	Strengthened Indian independence movement

Launch of the Non Cooperation Movement

Now that we know what is Non Cooperation Movement, let’s understand its launch. The movement began in 1920, led by Mahatma Gandhi. He called for a nationwide boycott of British goods, services, and institutions. Gandhi aimed to unite Indians in peaceful resistance to weaken British rule.

• Led by Mahatma Gandhi, the movement aimed for non-violent resistance against British rule.
• Boycott of British goods: To weaken their economy and promote Indian industries (Swadeshi).
• Surrender of titles and honors: Symbolic rejection of British authority and assertion of national pride.
• Non-compliance with British laws and institutions: Peaceful protests against taxes, regulations, and British-run institutions.
• Large-scale public demonstrations: Show of unity and strength in opposing British rule.

Click here to read: What is Non-Cooperation Movement in Hindi?

Features of the Non Cooperation Movement

Now that we know what is Non Cooperation Movement, let’s look at its features. The movement encouraged Indians to boycott British goods, services, and institutions. It promoted self-reliance by urging people to use local products like khadi. Gandhi advocated for peaceful protests and mass participation. It aimed to unite Indians against British rule and create a strong, non-violent resistance.

• Non-Violent Resistance: Gandhi’s philosophy of Satyagraha (truth force) formed the core principle. The movement strictly opposed violence and aimed to achieve Swaraj (self-rule) through peaceful means.
  
• Boycotts: This was a significant weapon. Indians boycotted:
  • British Goods: Encouraged the use of Indian-made products (Swadeshi) to weaken the British economy.
  • Educational Institutions: Indians withdrew their children from government-run or aided schools and colleges, protesting British-controlled education.
  • Courts: Indians refused to participate in the British legal system, challenging its authority.
    
• Resignations: People holding government positions, like lawyers and officials, resigned to demonstrate their disapproval of British rule.
  
• Peaceful Protests: Large gatherings, marches, and rallies were organized across India. These demonstrations showcased the movement’s strength and the widespread desire for independence.
  
• Promotion of National Unity: The NCM transcended religious and social barriers. People from all walks of life participated, fostering a sense of national unity.
  
• Self-Reliance: The movement encouraged Indians to become self-sufficient by promoting local production (Swadeshi) of textiles and other goods.
  
• The challenge to British Authority: By refusing to cooperate with British institutions, the NCM directly challenged the British authority’s control over India.

These features, combined with Gandhi’s leadership and mass participation, made the Non-Cooperation Movement a significant turning point in India’s freedom struggle. It paved the way for future movements and showcased the power of peaceful resistance to achieve political goals.

What were the causes of the Non-Cooperation Movement?

Now that we know what is Non Cooperation Movement, let’s understand its causes. The movement was driven by widespread dissatisfaction with British rule and its policies. Key issues included high taxes, racial discrimination, and economic exploitation. The Non-Cooperation Movement in India was sparked by several causes and motivations that led people to join the movement.

• Resentment of the British after the war:
  • Indians expected autonomy after supporting Britain during World War I.
  • The Government of India Act 1919 was disappointing.
  • Repressive acts like the Rowlatt Act fueled anger.
• Home Rule Movement:
  • Led by Annie Besant and Bal Gangadhar Tilak.
  • United extremists and moderates in the INC.
  • Lucknow Pact showed solidarity between the Muslim League and Congress.
  • The INC gained a militant character.
• Economic hardships due to WWI:
  • Soaring prices affected common people.
  • Peasants suffered due to stagnant agricultural prices.
  • Resulted in resentment against the government.
• Rowlatt Act and Jallianwala Bagh massacre:
  • Rowlatt Act and the Jallianwala Bagh massacre shattered faith in British justice.
  • The country rallied behind leaders advocating a firmer stance.
• Khilafat Movement:
  • Launched during WWI, defending the Ottoman caliphate.
  • Led by Ali Brothers, Maulana Azad, and others.
  • Supported by Mahatma Gandhi in a joint protest against the British.

Spread of Non Cooperation Movement

Now that we know what is Non Cooperation Movement, let’s understand its spread. The movement quickly gained traction across India as people from various regions and communities joined in. Gandhi’s call for boycotts and non-violent protests resonated widely.

The impact of the non-cooperation movement across different regions in India:

Region	Key Movements and Leaders
Bengal	Anti-union board agitation led by Birendranath Sasmal
Assam	Strikes in tea plantations, steamer services by J.M. Sengupta
United Province	Agrarian riots under Baba Ram Chandra’s leadership
	‘Eka movement’ peasant outburst led by Madari Pasi
Awadh	Prominent Kisan Sabha movement
Punjab	Akali movement for Gurudwara reform and communal unity
Rajasthan	Protests against cesses and begar; Bijolia and Bhil Movements
Gujarat	Vallabh Patel’s spread of non-cooperation
Karnataka	Limited impact; textile mill workers’ strike
Andhra	Linking tribal grievances to Non-Cooperation Movement
	Alluri Sitaram Raju’s leadership
Tamil Nadu	Led by C. Rajagopalachari, S. Satyamurthy, and Periyar E.V.R.
Kerala	Peasant anti-Jemni struggles; intense Mopillah revolt

What was Mahatma Gandhi’s role in leading the Non-Cooperation Movement?

Now that we know what is Non Cooperation Movement, let’s understand Mahatma Gandhi’s role. Gandhi was the key leader who launched the movement in 1920. He inspired millions with his call for peaceful resistance and non-violent protests. Gandhi encouraged boycotts of British goods and institutions and promoted self-reliance through local products like khadi. His leadership and vision were crucial in mobilizing the masses against British rule.

Mahatma Gandhi spearheaded the non-cooperation movement, issuing a manifesto in March 1920 advocating for non-violent resistance. Through this declaration, Gandhi urged people to:

• Embrace Swadeshi principles and practices.
• Promote local industries, particularly hand spinning and weaving.
• Work towards eliminating untouchability from society.

• In 1921, Gandhi undertook a nationwide tour to educate the public about the movement’s principles and objectives.

Why was the Non-Cooperation Movement called off?

Now that we know what is Non Cooperation Movement, let’s understand its withdrawal. The movement was halted abruptly in February 1922 after the Chauri Chaura incident, where a violent clash between protesters and police resulted in deaths. Gandhi decided to stop the movement to avoid further violence and maintain its non-violent nature. Other reasons included –

• Chauri Chaura Violence: A mob set fire to a police station, killing officers. This violated Gandhi’s principles of non-violence, leading him to call off the movement in February 1922.
• Discipline Challenges: The scale of the movement exposed difficulties in maintaining non-violent action. Incidents like the Moplah rebellion in Kerala showcased a lack of discipline among some participants.
• Khilafat Issue Faded: The central cause of the Khilafat movement, preserving the Ottoman Caliphate, became irrelevant. The Turks themselves abolished the Caliphate in 1922 and 1924.
• Shifting Strategies: As the movement progressed, some advocated for more radical tactics. This alienated sections of society and eroded popular support.
• Class Conflict Concerns: The movement’s focus on rent refusal against landlords (Zamindars) created a potential class conflict. Gandhi, aiming for a united front, opposed actions that could lead to a revolution.
• Government Crackdown: The British government responded harshly, banning volunteer groups, and public meetings, and silencing the press. Mass arrests of Congress leaders further weakened the movement.

How Did the People Respond to the Non Cooperation Movement?

Now that we know what is Non Cooperation Movement, let’s look at how people responded. Many Indians eagerly joined the movement, boycotting British goods, services, and institutions. The widespread support showed a strong desire for change and resistance against British rule, highlighting the movement’s impact on Indian society.

• Businessmen: They joined in because they had seen benefits from the earlier Swadeshi movement, which promoted Indian-made goods. They hoped this movement would weaken British control and help their businesses.
• Peasants and Middle Class: Both groups saw this as a chance to voice their unhappiness with British rule and actively took part in protests and other activities.
• Women: Women were very involved, participating in protests and supporting the leaders, marking an important change in their role in society.
• Plantation Workers: Many workers left their jobs in tea gardens, despite facing restrictions and difficulties, to support Gandhi’s cause.

Significance of the Non Cooperation Movement

Now that we know what is Non Cooperation Movement, let’s understand its significance. The movement marked a major shift in India’s fight for independence by demonstrating the power of non-violent resistance. It united people from various backgrounds and showed that collective action could challenge British rule.

• Unity Through Participation: Peasants, workers, students, and women all joined the movement, creating a powerful united front against British rule.
• Non-Cooperation as a Weapon: The movement championed non-violent resistance and civil disobedience. By encouraging boycotts of British schools, colleges, and courts, it weakened the British administration and challenged its authority.
• Awakening National Identity: The movement ignited a sense of national pride and unity among the Indian masses. It fostered self-reliance, self-confidence, and a collective Indian identity.
• A Platform for the Masses: The Non-Cooperation Movement expanded the fight for independence beyond elite circles. It provided a platform for ordinary people to actively participate in the freedom struggle.
• Gandhi’s Rise and Legacy: Mahatma Gandhi solidified his position as a prominent leader. His principles of non-violence and Satyagraha became powerful tools for achieving freedom.
• International Impact: The movement gained international attention, garnering sympathy for India’s struggle. It exposed the oppressive nature of British rule and helped secure support from other nations.

Difference Between Non Cooperation Movement and Civil Disobedience Movement

Now that we know what is Non Cooperation Movement, let’s understand the difference between it and the Civil Disobedience Movement. The Non-Cooperation Movement started in 1920 and focused on boycotting British goods and institutions. In contrast, the Civil Disobedience Movement, launched in 1930, involved actively defying British laws, such as refusing to pay taxes.

Feature	Non-Cooperation Movement (NCM)	Civil Disobedience Movement (CDM)
Goal	Achieve Swaraj (self-rule) through non-violent resistance	Challenge specific unjust British laws and policies
Leader	Mahatma Gandhi	Mahatma Gandhi
Time Period	Challenge specific, unjust British laws and policies	1920 – 1922 (withdrew after the Chauri Chaura incident)
Methods	Boycotts of British goods, schools, and courts; resignations from government positions; peaceful protests	Selective disobedience of specific laws and regulations; non-violent protests
Scale of Participation	Large-scale participation across India	Primarily focused on targeted actions by specific groups
Nature of Protest	More passive and symbolic resistance	More active and confrontational disobedience
Reason for Ending	No specific endpoint, gradually faded as negotiations with the British began	No specific endpoint, gradually faded as negotiations with British began
Impact	Showed the strength of Indian nationalism and inspired future movements	Challenged British authority and highlighted specific grievances

Additional Notes:

• The NCM aimed for broader societal change, while the CDM focused on specific laws.
• The NCM was more geographically widespread, while the CDM had a more targeted approach.
• The NCM was more peaceful overall, while the CDM involved some acts of civil disobedience that could be seen as more confrontational.

Why did the Non Cooperation movement fail?

Now that we know what is Non Cooperation Movement, let’s understand its failure. The movement ended abruptly in February 1922 after the Chauri Chaura incident, where violent clashes led to deaths. Gandhi halted the movement to prevent further violence and maintain its non-violent principles.

• Merger of Khilafat Issue:
  • The Khilafat movement focused solely on religious concerns.
  • Convergence with NCM had limited long-term benefits for secular politics in India.
• NCM gained substantial urban support but lacked universal backing.
• Rural areas remained detached due to limited awareness.
• Movements lacked a well-defined roadmap beyond non-cooperation.
• The goals for achieving independence and addressing socio-economic issues were unclear.
• Fragmentation due to varying strategies, ideologies, and priorities.
• Disagreements on boycotting legislative councils (e.g., C.R. Das opposed council boycott).

What is Non Cooperation Movement UPSC ?

Let’s try to understand what is Non Cooperation movement from UPSC’s perspective –

• Significance of the Non-Cooperation Movement:
  • A crucial chapter in India’s struggle for independence from British rule.
  • Led by Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi after the Jallianwala Bagh Massacre.
  • Aimed to resist British authority through non-violent means (satyagraha).
• Protest Strategies:
  • Participants boycotted British goods.
  • Embraced local handicrafts.
  • Engaged in picketing liquor stores.
• Ahimsa and Mobilization:
  • Principles of nonviolence (Ahimsa) were central.
  • Gandhi mobilized ordinary individuals nationwide for Indian independence.
• Fear of Mass Uprising:
  • Gandhi worried that the campaign might escalate into a large-scale revolt.
  • On September 5, 1920, the non-cooperation movement officially began.
• Chauri Chaura Incident:
  • In February 1922, peasants set fire to a police station in Chauri Chaura, Uttar Pradesh, leading to the movement’s end. 🇮🇳

What were the causes of Non cooperation movement class 10th

Let’s try to understand what is Non Cooperation movement for class 10th. For Class 10 students, the Non-Cooperation Movement is a key topic in history. It provides detailed knowledge about the strategies used by Indians to oppose British rule. This movement showed the power of peaceful protest and self-reliance. Students learn about the boycott of British goods, resignation from jobs, and the establishment of Indian institutions. Understanding this movement is crucial for exams as it covers important dates, events, and figures in India’s struggle for independence.

Conclusion

What is Non Cooperation Movement? it was a pivotal chapter in India’s fight for independence. Launched in 1920, it united Indians in a peaceful resistance against British rule, marking a significant shift in the struggle for freedom. Though it ended in 1922 due to violence at Chauri Chaura, its legacy lives on in the political awakening it sparked and the foundation it laid for future protests. The movement demonstrated the power of non-violence and collective action, showing that even under colonial oppression, peaceful resistance could challenge a mighty empire. Its broader significance lies in the lessons it offers for global movements, proving that persistence, unity, and non-violent resistance can be potent tools for achieving justice and freedom.

Read More:-

• Freedom Fighters of 1857: Lists, Name and Facts
• Indian National Movement – In Brief
• What was the Rowlatt Act of 1919: A Historical Insight
• Partition of Bengal (1905): History, Causes, and Facts
• The Gandhi-Irwin Pact: A Turning Point in India’s Freedom Struggle

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)