NIRF| Top Colleges/Universities, History & Methodology

  • The Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD) supported and despatched the National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF Ranking) on September 29, 2015.
  • In addition, this system depicts a method for ranking foundations across the country.
  • The technique is based on a broad organisation of generic ideas presented by a Core Committee established by NIRF Ranking.
  • Furthermore, to separate the broad borders used to position various colleges and foundations. The boundaries comprehensively cover “Instructing,
  • Learning and Resources,” “Exploration and Professional Practices,” “Graduation Outcomes,” “Effort and Inclusivity,” and “Discernment,” on the other hand, are all important.
  • Also, on April 4, 2016, India Rankings – 2016 were released, which were based on same framework.
  • The primary positioning boundaries for the India NIRF Ranking – 2017 remain the same as previously.

Table of Contents

  • Furthermore, there are a few significant alterations in a few of sub-boundaries.
  • This year, each significant foundation will be assigned both a general and a discipline-specific role.
  • Aside from that, the National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF Ranking) of the Indian Education ministry is a concept used by the Indian government to rate university education organizations in the country.
  • On September 29, 2015, Deshalb MHRD and Ministry of Staff Development transmitted The Framework.
  • To add to the confusion, different sorts of establishments, such as colleges and universities, design foundations, and pharma businesses, have different rankings based on particular fields of operation.
  • Executive-level firms, drugstore chains, and design companies are also offered.
  • As part of the positioning process, the Framework makes use of a few boundaries such as assets, examination, and partner discernment
  • These boundaries have been grouped into five groups, each of which has been assigned a certain weight.
  • This depends on the type of establishment. Around 3500 foundations took an active interest in the first round of rankings, according to the report.
  • As a result, on April 3, 2017, NIRF Ranking released the 2017 ranked records.
  • In 2016, NIRF had four classifications (universities, engineering, management, and pharmaceutical), although in 2017, 2 additional categories (overall or institution) were created. Over 3,000 establishments were interested in the rankings.
  • The institutions that engaged in the 2018 NIRF rankings, which were announced on April 3, 2018, climbed.
  • This year’s rankings, however, were released, and they included the overall rankings as well as rankings for universities and colleges in the fields of engineering and management as well as pharmacy, medicine, architecture, and law.
  • Around 3,800 foundations participated simultaneously in the NIRF Ranking in 2020, which is 20 percent more than in 2019.
  • The Board submitted final 2020 position records to the US Commerce department on July 11, 2020. The dental foundations were moved to new location.
  • On Aug 21, 2014, it also conducted an all-day seminar to enhance the idea of presenting universities in India.
  • People in attendance decided to form a committee to advance the development of a national ranking framework.
  • After that a co-selection of college representatives and IIM representatives was also agreed upon for the proposed board.
  • An advisory council consisting of 16 individuals was formed with NIRF Ranking as part secretary.
  • The vice chancellors of Delhi University, EFL University, Gujarati Central College, and JNU all had poor habits. IIT Occasion . for example, IIT Madras, IIM Ahmedabad, IIM Bangalore, NIT Tiruchirappalli, National institute of technology Warangal, IIITM Gwalior, IISER Bhopal, SPA Delhi, Anything a, and NBA all have overseers.
  • Des migrants, the Center Board established a set of quantifiable criteria for assessing the positions of the various organisations.
  • Aside from that, these lines divided into five categories.
  • Other competent offices charged with executing comparative tasks for different specialties’ organizations.
  • The reports draught created by Surendra Prasad, executive director of the National Board of Accreditation and member of the centre advisory group.
  • The master board built by UGC incorporated into the NIRF Ranking system, and the system created by this master board incorporated into the NIRF Ranking system (National Institute of Research Funding).
  • Additionally, the centre panel proposed a structure for positioning organisations that would include training for executives.
  • AICTE created boundaries and measurements for foundations offering drugstore education as well as engineering training.
  • Dimensions for designing foundations must also determined by the centre panels decision-making boundary lines.
  • Each of the NIRF Ranking borders has divided into five broad heads or gatherings, each of which has been further divided into smaller, more easily comprehendible sub-groupings.
  • Notwithstanding this, each wide head assigned a standard mass. The sub-heads within each head should also have the right weight distributions.
  • As a result, an appropriate measurement has proposed, which assigns a score to each section under consideration.
  • Once the sub-head scores have been tallied, each individual head given a score.
  • The aggregate ranking also influenced by the weights allocated to each of the heads. In extreme cases, the overall score can range from 0 to 100.
  • Also, the board of trustees proposed that organisations be divided into two categories:
  • Classification Public institutions, such as state universities, have been created by legislation.

What is NIRF Ranking

  • The National Institutional Ranking Framework used by the Indian Ministry of Education to rate Indian universities (NIRF Ranking).
  • On September 29, 2015, it also endorsed by the MHRD and sent out by the Minister of Human Resource Development.
  • As result, there are independent rankings for colleges and schools, design organisations, executive foundations, drugstore foundations, and engineering organisations, among others.
  • Also, the executive foundations, drug store foundations, and engineering organisations are worthy of mention..
  • Some boundaries used in the Framework, such as those relating to the allocation of assets and the exploration of potential alliances.
  • They have grouped into five groups, and each group has assigned a certain weight. The weights are determined by the type of organisation involved.
  • Around 3500 foundations voluntarily participated in the first round of ranking.
  • Assembling a comprehensive picture of the advanced education frameworks in India is a mammoth and difficult task.
  • A national ranking framework (NIRF) will released every year by the Ministry of Education with the goal of promoting competitive excellence in the countrys higher education institutions.
  • In addition, the NIRF Ranking will assist students who interested in pursuing higher education in India.
  • NIRF Ranking and its boundaries and classes should be investigated.
  • As a consequence, the National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) Ranking is the part of the Ministry of Staff Development (MHRD).
  • Aside from that, it has endorsed the NIRF Ranking structure and implemented the first version in 2015.
  • The NIRF Ranking 2020: List of Top 100 Overall Educational Institutions in India Ranked by MHRD Document photograph of IIT Delhi
  • This is a file photo of the Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi.
  • The MHRD’s NIRF 2020 has compiled a list of the top 100 generally instructive foundations in India.
  • Its worth mentioning that the yearly Nationwide Institution Ranking System (NIRF) Ranking released in 2015, with the main rankings following in 2016.
  • Overall, college, designing, the executives, drug store, school, clinical and engineering are all included in NIRF 2020’s 10 categories.
  • Also, IIT Madras and IISc Bangalore sacked the initial two positions in order to maintain their positions from last year.
  • IIT Delhi ranked third among educational institutions in the country.
  • The National Board of Certification (NBA) in India uses the Public Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) to rank all higher education institutions.
  • The Ministry (MHRD) could perhaps evaluate all National universities and colleges.
  • It was implemented in 2015 and the first NIRF rankings were published in 2016. NBA takes care of positioning.
  • A few understudies in the past referred to QS world college rankings or Shanghai positioning, which did not take into account the characteristics of our sub-mainland.
  • In addition, the private party rankings showed a dread of inclination. Because of this, GoI decided to send its own positioning system out into the world.
  • NIRF Ranking created by a 16-member centre panel delegated by the Ministry of Human Resources Development (MHRD).
  • From that point forward, its been an annual affair in which its delivered in April of every year.
  • There are also ten categories of educational establishments in the United States – generally colleges and universities as well as the boards of design and engineering.
  • 100 establishments are located in the college, general, and school classifications while 200 establishments are located in the design classifications.
  • Between 15 and 75 businesses are located in administration, pharmacy, law and clinical as well as dental and design.
  • The centre councils boundaries should used as a guideline for determining the measurements for positioning design firms.
  • As a result of this coordination, the boundaries have divided into five major heads or groups, each of which has subdivided into relevant sub-groupings.
  • A standard gravity attributed to each wide head. The added weight of the sub-heads within each head should be suitable.
  • There has also been a proposal for a reasonable measurement that assigns a score to each sub
  • These scores then summed together to give each individual head a total score. The overall index computed using weights assigned to each head.
  • It is also possible for the overall score to reach a maximum of 100 points.
  • Organisations should separated into two categories, according to the committee.
  • This category includes organisations of public significance established by law, such as state universities and private universities.
  • There also foundations that fall into the Class B category, meaning that they affiliated with a university and do not value academic

History of NIRF Ranking

  • A solid and complete outsider Data-Base that could provide all important data is lacking (depending on the situation for registering the said scores)
  • Determining the exact location of a foundation is also crucial.
  • Please also ensure that you have submitted all information in the configuration that will be accessible at the NIRF entrance by a certain date.
  • In addition, the NIRF entrance will have a separate sign indicating the cutoff times.
  • As a result of a legitimate concern for transparency, the foundations must also transfer the submitted information to a separate, openly visible site.
  • Foundations must also submit their information for India Rankings 2017.
  • As a result, they should post the last accommodation on their site, along with an email address where they can receive feedback and suggestions.
  • In addition, organisations should be open to evaluating comments and input in a fair and objective manner in order to make corrections.
  • as long as this true (inside the schedule opening to be declared by NIRF on its site).
  • As well as, all organisations required to host information submitted for India Rankings 2017 for a period of three years, starting on November 15th, 2016.
  • Institutions that do not publish the information given to NIRF on their own websites risk being disqualified, as indicated in.
  • As a result, if the material submitted isn’t easily accessible on the Institute’s own website (NIRF will do a restricted checking on an arbitrary premise),
  • after an underlying Notice, its enrollment for positioning most likely going to retracted.
  • After proper notice, the Institution will removed from the ranking list.
  • The information should ideally kept in a filed manner on the organizations website for the next three years, allowing for easy cross-checking.
  • Aside from that, businesses that fail to do so honestly or engage in unethical practises will excluded from participating in future positioning studies for a period of two years.
  • It also made possible for the National Institute for Research and Development (NIRF) to keep track of the organizations records.
  • Moreover, if necessary, evaluated accounts to ensure that moral standards adhered to.
  • Whenever a company getting closer to completing an actual check, they expected to work together.
  • Non-cooperation could also lead to the organizations participation in positioning activities halted because of its non-cooperation.
  • When it comes to certain boundaries (such as research and patenting), the information will gathered from publicly available databases.
  • NIRF will use Web of Science and the Indian Science Index, as well as any other materials it deems acceptable. A subset of these shown in Evaluation Methods.
  • NIRF retains the right to not use information from any of these sources or to incorporate different sources if this warranted.
  • In order to do this, NIRF will either directly contact these assets or seek assistance from the asset distributors.
  • For its part, NIRF has the authority to alter any of the measurements in light of a legitimate concern for legitimization required by the exigencies or in light of what it has learned.
  • As a result of this, any resulting advancements will announced at the time of the rankings announcement
  • Foundations interested in participating in the positioning activity invited to register at the NIRF entrance starting on September 1, 2016.
  • The information should sent to an online office created for this purpose before November 15, 2016.
  • NIRF, on its own or with the assistance of other reputable partner organisations, will also verify information whenever it deemed necessary and feasible.
  • Through the use of programming, NIRF Ranking will remove the important data from this information and process the different measurements in order to rank foundations based on this information.
  • In addition to that, this measure expected to completed in approximately 90 days, with rankings released on the first Monday of April 2017.
  • Apart from that, NIRF Ranking will make every attempt to put raw data on the NIRF site after it has appropriately prepared for institution cross-checking.
  • Information that will processed at the end of the process.
  • En outre, NIRF Ranking will be responsible for ensuring accuracy of its entries in the information distributed by the Institution.
  • The institution will permitted to analyse information provided by or collected from third-party sources to the same extent.
  • If the Institution does not make any comments or critiques concerning the material displayed within a certain length of time.
  • This informations accuracy will be approved. No pleas for remedies will accepted after the declared cutoff time or after the rankings have released.
  • The same holds true if its discovered that a company has purposefully manipulated the information submitted, causing incorrect rankings.
  • Foundation will removed from the positioning rundown and future rankings by NIRF Ranking, and a reasonable note with this impact will distributed.

Methodology and their Parameters NIRF

  • Developing a set of measurements for positioning scholarly foundations in accordance with the boundaries set by the centre board required for methodology.
  • Also, these boundaries organised into five broad categories, each of which has broken down into subcategories.
  • Every expansive head also assigned a general weight. In addition, the different sub-heads within each head also weighted appropriately.
  • Identifying the essential information needed to appropriately measure the exhibition score under each subheading took a similar amount of effort.
  • Its also crucial to separate between information that the foundation can surely supply or that easily obtained from other sources, and information that plainly and abundantly obvious.
  • As a result, the need for a check arises. Considering the legitimate concern for transparency, this is significant.
  • On the basis of this information, a reasonable measurement then proposed, which generates a score for each subheading.
  • These scores then summed together to give each individual head a total score. The overall score determined by the loads assigned to each head.
  • In addition, the total score might be up to 100 points.
  • Following that, the foundations would rated according to their scores, and rank requests may made for them.
  • A total of at least 1,000 understudies have recruited by them (determined based on supported admission).
  • Aside from that, the institution is a midway-subsidized organization/college of the Indian Parliament.
  • A discipline-specific position will given to institutions.
  • In addition, institutions that laser-focused on a single basic discipline (engineering, clinical, law, management, pharmacy, or UG degree schools in the arts, sciences, and humanities)
  • Only a discipline specific position will given to schools (e.g., Business) with less than 1000 understudies enrolled (based on supported admission).
  • (Universities or Institutions’ schools and departments, for example) should enlist on their own and provide additional information specific to the school or department in question
  • the discipline explicit positioning rundown if they want to remembered for it
  • Consider this option if you’d like to make your important resources/schools more accessible to the public at large
  • Discipline-specific rankings will only take into account choices available on the enlistment entryway
  • Additionally, such as Arts, Design, Engineering, Health and Life Sciences, Humanities and Social Sciences, Law Faculty, Medical School, Management Departments, and so on.
  • In addition, colleges and universities affiliated with undergraduate teaching organisations are welcome to participate.
  • (Some of them may fear that they won’t do well on a typical positioning rundown because of their lack of research-related boundaries.
  • Moreover, they can achieve high marks in a variety of areas, such as Graduation Outcomes and Perception.
  • And they’ll get a fair look in the university rankings that will also released this year, and in which the weightings will adjusted accordingly.
  • If there are a large number of establishments that want to position themselves in a discipline, then those positions will be
  • list of notable establishments for that discipline, with a good ranking score.
  • After analysing the data, NIRF Ranking will make an official conclusion on a discipline’s position.
  • Open Universities and Affiliating Universities (whether supported/subsidized by the state or the federal government) not often enrolled for positioning purposes.
  • Although these colleges may have their own educational or testing grounds.
  • Are welcome to contribute to the discussion with information specific to their geographic location. There is no information about their status as open or associated colleges in the material given.
  • As a result, only those institutions that have graduated at least three sets of understudies in specific projects will considered for rankings.
  • The organisation will not be able to apply for a job with the government if it does not have a strategy that fits this condition.
  • On most assessments, calculating score boundaries for the two types of rankings (normal and discipline explicit) is similar. Furthermore,
  • Also, on a few boundaries, the loads are slightly different to account for discipline-specific considerations.
  • Furthermore, the percentile predictions for the two sets of rankings were carried out separately.

List of top 10  NIRF Ranked Colleges/Universities in India

College/University Name Location Rank
Indian Institute of Technology Madras Tamil Nadu 1
Indian Institute of Science Karnataka 2
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi Delhi 3
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Maharashtra 4
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur West Bengal 5
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur Uttar Pradesh 6
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati Assam 7
Jawaharlal Nehru University Delhi 8
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee Uttarakhand 9
Banaras Hindu University Uttar Pradesh 10

Frequently Asked Questions About  NIRF Ranked Colleges/Universities in India

What is NIRF Ranking?

There was also the Nationally Institution Ranking Framework (NIRF Ranking), a method employed by India’s Ministry of Education to rate the country’s best higher education institutions. On Sept 29, 2015, approved by the Ministry of human resource development and sent by the Minister of Skills Development.

What is the Full form of NIRF?

The full from of NIRF is National Institutional Ranking Framework.

How to improve NIRF Ranking?

NIRF ranking can be improved through best facility and best teaching and more

Read more
List of Universities ranked by NIRF